Event Calendar

Study: Variable tolls cut traffic, raise revenue

STATEN ISLAND ADVANCE
Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Tri-State Transportation Campaign details proposal for off-peak and rush-hour tolls as MTA hearing looms

A week from today, Staten Islanders will go to Susan Wagner High School to hear what the Metropolitan Transportation Authority has to say about its plan to raise fares and tolls this spring.

They won’t hear any details about what kind of toll discounts are in store for the borough, or a variable toll strategy, like the one adopted by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey two years ago when it hiked tolls on its six New Jersey crossings.

But a study released yesterday shows that variable tolls, which encourage drivers to travel during off-peak hours, could significantly help reduce congestion on city bridges and tunnels, including the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, and raise revenue at the same time.

“This actually gives the MTA and the governor something to offer drivers,” said Jon Orcutt, associate director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign.

Lower tolls during off hours could help cut rush-hour traffic by 4 to 12 percent, according to a report from the campaign. That means drivers could travel faster and save as much as $36 million a year in congestion-related expenses.

The campaign proposes keeping off-peak tolls at $3.50 each way, or $7 on the Verrazano – where tolls are collected only Staten Island bound – and raising them to $5 (or $10 on the Verrazano) during morning and evening rush hours.

Meanwhile, the MTA plans to raise tolls 25 or 50 cents each way – regardless of the time of day – and hasn’t indicated what the Staten Island resident and E-Zpass discounts would be.

“For the MTA to increase rush-hour bridge and tunnel tolls this year while leaving off-peak rates alone would not be a radical step for the New York area,” Orcutt said. “Rather, it would extend a sensible policy that has already won acceptance.”

But critics say the plan unfairly targets low-income commuters, who can’t adjust their work schedules to avoid the higher tolls.

“Nobody ever talks about distributional issues,” said Jonathan Peters, a College of Staten Island finance professor who studies equity in tolls. “Most people of lower-income status generally have less flexibility in their schedule.”

Orcutt responded that various tolls rewarded those who have to travel during the rush hour – and pay more - with less congested roads.

“This is like strangling somebody and saying you’re saving oxygen,” Peters said. “Yes, that’s true. But it’s not the solution we’re looking for.”

Tom Kelly, an MTA spokesman, argued that time-of-day pricing would not work in New York City because commuters have too many ways to avoid paying anything to drive into the city, like the untolled East River and Harlem River bridges.

But Staten Island commuters have no such options – only the Verrazano.

Meanwhile, in testimony before the state Legislature in Albany yesterday, MTA executive director Katherine Lapp reiterated the need for a fare and toll hike to fill what the agency says is an estimated $2.8 billion budget gap over the next two years. After cost-cutting, that gap drops to $952 million.

In Manhattan, the Straphangers Campaign handed out fliers urging commuters to fight the MTA’s fare and toll hikes by attending the public hearings.

MTA hearing

WHERE:
Susan Wagner High School

WHEN:
Wednesday, Feb. 12, 4 to 8 p.m.

MORE DETAILS:
Visit www.mta.info
 


By MICHAEL WAGNER
Reprinted here with permission from the
Click Here to read the Advance online


 

 


Tolls

 

 

More "In the News"

Landmark Building, Nanjing University, Old Campus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Click Here to return to the CSI Homepage

 

Top of Page